Differences Between Sustainable Living and Eco-living

Updated: Sep 13, 2021

Sustainable and Eco-living are two terms that go hand in hand and in many cases are used interchangeably. However, there are subtle differences in these two words which are generally used when talking about environmentally friendly ways of life.

The term Sustainable living refers to a lifestyle where we live in harmony with nature without damaging the natural environment and maintain an eco-friendly lifestyle that lasts for generations. Professor John Ikerd of Emeritus University of Missouri, states that-“to achieve and maintain sustainability, we must integrate a new ecology of economics in finding ways to work and to live in harmony and in balance with each other, other living things, and our natural environment.” He has suggested that organic farming should now be our primary focus.

On the other hand, eco-living/ villages are designed to protect the environment and to balance the natural ecology with the combination of its production; could be said as the economics of eco-living. To look at a glance both, seem to protect the environment living with it, in reality, they have very different from one another.

The Primary Differences between Sustainable and Eco-Living

Sustainable livingEco-living1Governance: The role of the community(people) is minimum when it comes to the governance of the local community.Governance: In this kind of community it is the members of the community that are at the forefront and govern their own community.2Program design: Sustainable development has been the buzz of 1990 decades, and governments have been involved in promoting sustainable development. The terms ‘sustainability’ and ‘sustainable’ appeared for the first time in the Oxford English Dictionary during the second half of the 20th centuryProgram design: A participatory approach is applied in the design of community programs and their development.

They will have the idea and resources for the implementation of community projects.

3Design of houses: This completely depends on the individual on how he wants to construct his house while considering government regulations.

The construction is not restricted to how to make their houses. Housing patterns are not restricted to where they live or how they live.

Design of Houses: It is controlled by the community, all the houses in the community assimilate with each other. The design of the houses is also restricted to the airflow, light direction, and are designed to conserve energy consumption and keep it at a bare minimum.

The materials used in the houses are also considered to be eco-friendly.

4Environmental protection: The protection of the environment is in the hands of the government.

Environmental Protection: The community is responsible for the protection and the sustainability of the natural habitat around them.5Food production: Sustainable farming methods depend on farm owners, the government can only enforce regulations to promote food production in such a way that the produced food items are healthier for consumption.

The farmer in the free market economic situation is driven by a profit motive, who will be held responsible for the production.

Food production: In the eco-living village, food production is not profit-driven but is for consumption. They are responsible for producing organic food, protecting water supplies inside the

small community.

In conclusion Sustainable and Eco-living are based on a similar concept and in the periphery of protecting nature and making living with nature. Food production and protection of natural resources are the main objectives of both the concepts.

However, eco-living is more connected to nature and the energies of the people living in that area. It also supports the future of mankind and the planet. So the demand for an eco-village/living is ever increasing.

38 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All